Most brands quit just before the inflection point. This article breaks down why consistent, 36-month exclusive outreach to billionaires and centimillionaires transforms “uncertain marketing spend” into a structurally predictable pipeline of qualified, decision-making buyers. Using real campaign data, we show how patience, disciplined allocation, and precise audience access compound into market dominance—while those chasing shortcuts are quietly priced out of the game.

If you have even a minimally adequate grasp of how reality works, you recognize a thin, unforgiving line between outcomes and non-outcomes that depends not on talent, insight, or luck—but on the continuation of directed effort. In other words: you can be standing at the very edge of success, a few figurative steps away, and step off the track precisely where the result was already waiting beyond the bend. In most cases, this turning point remains invisible. You never find out how little you were actually missing.

Sometimes people do discover how close they were. Some of them struggle with this knowledge for a long time—books are written about it, films are made, entire motivational frameworks are built around it. But in a certain sense, reality is merciful: the majority never realize what they could have achieved had they simply continued in the same direction a little longer—just as long as was genuinely required.

Evidence for this is trivial and empirical: collective challenges, marathons, programs with a fixed minimum duration. It is artificially imposed patience. If participants follow the rules in good faith, the result is almost inevitable.

The result in such models is not a miracle; it is a function. Yet by the time it materializes, “appetite comes with eating”: depending on how demanding the journey was, people may feel subjectively underwhelmed. That is normal. But regardless of emotions, the result exists—and on a long enough horizon, it is statistically predictable.

This same logic underpins rational budget allocation.

In the context of the wealthiest people on the planet, we applied this principle to a very specific question: what is the time span from the start of communication to the first direct inquiry from a UHNWI for one of our clients in the business aviation segment, measured over a 36-month exclusive contract period?

We prepared separate tables for billionaires and centimillionaires. If you are interested in exploring the use of our service in a private demo setting, we can substantiate every statement in this article with documented case-level evidence.

Schedule a free demo

In the tables, the horizontal axis represents a 36-month period—the full term of an exclusive contract. It assumes a monthly outbound cycle: your marketing materials are sent directly to potential clients among billionaires, centimillionaires, and multimillionaires, totaling 6,000 individuals per month. Learn more about 36-Month Exclusive Agreement

The vertical axis reflects the number of inbound requests for additional information about the product being promoted. Only positive requests are counted. Unsubscribes and refusals are intentionally excluded from this metric, although they are, of course, part of the broader responsiveness profile: they indicate the overall level of interest in your offer and the audience’s tolerance toward receiving your communications. These are valuable operational signals, and we can prepare a separate report on this layer upon request.

In this article, however, we are sharply focused on one thing: positive requests—the moments where you are directly connected to a potentially interested individual who simultaneously:

can unquestionably afford what you are selling; and
is the decision-maker.

This is a fundamental distinction from mass digital platforms. There, you are presented with “leads,” but you cannot reliably know who is behind them: an intermediary trying to monetize the spread, a random curious observer, a competitor, or someone with no mandate and no budget—yet all of it is often recorded as campaign “success.”

Number of unique billionaires’ inquiries distributed across 36 months.

Number of unique centimillionaires’ inquiries distributed across 36 months.

Please note: during this period, not all 6,000 slots were used every month due to segmentation, product disclosure constraints, and limited inventory. As a result, the actual distribution ranged from 2,500 to 6,000 touchpoints per month, with some months skipped entirely.

As the tables show, the number of monthly inquiries fluctuates noticeably. In this specific case, that variation reflects the live reaction of the audience to each specific offer, because our client is a broker whose results are directly dependent on the quality and relevance of inventory. Not every aircraft on the market objectively satisfies the needs of this audience—on price, configuration, timing, or any number of objective and subjective factors.

If you are a manufacturer or an owner-reseller, your metric might look different: if each campaign consistently features exceptionally strong, timely, well-structured offers that match the current demand landscape, aggregate inbound volume would logically be higher. The core trigger of an inquiry is the attractiveness of your offer. And of course, results are also influenced by brand recognition, reputation, track record, and market context.

Now, look at the shape of the process.

Across the entire 36-month cycle, new inquiries continue to appear. Taking into account both billionaires and centimillionaires, the total number of recorded inquiries reached 159. This does not include requests received directly by the client that were not logged into their corporate dashboard. In this particular case, that gap is statistically negligible: we have been working with this client for nine years, and the level of transparency and trust is exceptionally high.

With some long-term clients, and especially newer ones, direct inbound leads are not always reflected in their corporate dashboards, whether due to confidentiality practices or simply a lack of reporting on the client’s side. As a result, our lead data may be incomplete, as it reflects only the portion of information available from our side. This is precisely why we selected this specific client as the reference case: it is as close to real, clean process dynamics as you can get.

159 direct UHNWI inquiries are 159 branches of potential or unfolding relationships.

Naturally, not every one of these communications has already matured into a closed transaction. Many of these individuals submitted repeat requests during the 36-month period, but repeat inquiries were deliberately excluded from this metric to avoid inflating the figures.

One key structural point: all personal communication with prospects occurs on the client’s side. We are not involved in any communication on behalf of our clients; we remain completely invisible in these exchanges and act solely as an unseen content distribution partner—like FedEx or UPS, but in a fully digital format. They decide whether to remove a contact from future mailings or keep them in the ongoing cycle. In this case, the client retains almost everyone, including those with whom they have already closed deals and built ongoing relationships. For them, the mailing becomes a strategic infrastructure:

– a notification layer about new opportunities,

– a barometer of market appetite,

– a mechanism for testing pricing, and

– a framework for tracking multiple relevant behavioral and analytical triggers.

And here we should be blunt.

If, after direct communication with 159 billionaires and centimillionaires—people who themselves raised their hands, requested more detail, and had both purchasing power and decision authority—your team fails to close a single deal (each of which could easily cover the full cost of a 36-month campaign), then the problem is not the channel. Something is fundamentally wrong with your product, your positioning, your team, or your negotiation skills/culture.

Let’s examine the economics.

The total cost of a 36-month exclusive contract is €270,000. Payments are made in equal monthly installments of €7,500. For any serious company operating in a high-ticket environment, this is not an abstract figure; it is a structurally rational investment relative to the potential outcomes.

The median price of the aircraft promoted in the campaigns reflected in the tables was 44 million USD. A single successful transaction comfortably covers all marketing costs for the full 36-month period. I am not at liberty to disclose specific performance details, but you can draw the obvious inference: this is not the client’s first contract and not their first renewal. The number and quality of closed deals have allowed them to allocate budget to extend their exclusive agreement with us for decades ahead. This is how it works in reality, not in demos or theoretical projections.

First you invest in awareness, credibility, and familiarity—up to the point of the first major transaction. After that, you are no longer “expecting”; you are maintaining a rhythm that reinforces your position. Your initial investment is effectively amortized, and subsequent cycles become a strategic defense and expansion mechanism.

A critical structural advantage of our exclusive contract model is the locked-in rate. If you enter into an exclusive agreement now and maintain continuity, your price remains fixed—even if, ten years from now, the external cost of accessing a similar audience has multiplied several times. In a world where the cost of attention keeps rising, this is not just “favorable pricing.” It is a compounded strategic advantage.

Below, please see the average price increase in CPC and CPL across major ad platforms.

**Note:** LinkedIn’s CPC was already significantly higher than Google and Facebook at the beginning of the period, so its percentage increase appears smaller even though it has remained the most expensive channel.

**Note:** *2015 values are reconstructed from earlier benchmark studies (Pointerpro, Hochman, historic FB data, etc.) to show order of magnitude change, not precise per-vertical pricing.

Let’s be fair: aviation is an ideal vertical for our model. Private jets are actively used, geographically fluid, and directly embedded in the lifestyle and logistics of our audience. The decision cycle and transaction values are perfectly aligned with the mechanics of our reach. This option is currently not available to other business jet market players due to an active exclusive agreement.

But other markets—superyachts, iconic real estate, museum-grade art, ultra-luxury products—also derive substantial benefits from exclusive access to this audience.

Take, for example, the New York or Miami luxury real estate market (Exclusive rights are granted on a state-by-state basis. Exclusions apply). The opportunity to effectively control the depth and quality of exposure to the truly relevant global audience exists right now. The window is open. This does not mean some mystical monopoly. It means you can outpace every competitor in consistency, relevance, and precision of your touchpoints with the world’s wealthiest buyers.

All that is required is understanding one simple fact: demand exists independently of your participation in it. If you believe that securing an exclusive listing on a property or portfolio “protects” you and guarantees that clients will somehow find you—then you are underestimating how fast your position can be eroded. After one or two cycles of our exclusive contract in your region, a leaner and more disciplined competitor with structured access to this audience can easily step into your comfort zone and start working with “your” clients—on both the buyer and seller sides. If you don’t see that, it is not because the threat is absent. It is because you have grown complacent.

For other segments—yachts, rare art, extreme luxury—let’s reiterate what we have been saying for years: this is not an exotic novelty. For you, this is infrastructure. A must-have. If you still don’t see the simplicity and elegance of the solution, that is your decision. You will not capture all the money in the world anyway. Perhaps you are genuinely satisfied with where you are.

Now let us circle back to the core principle: Patience is a Virtue.

The graphs clearly show that the flow of new inquiries is sustained throughout the entire 36-month cycle. If you launch one, two, or even several campaigns and “nothing happens,” this does not mean that nothing will happen. It means you did not give the system time to work. You may have stopped one step before the request from the right client—the one with motivation, mandate, and liquidity. You may have fallen short of the trust threshold.

Consistent, intelligent, respectful visibility in the inboxes of these individuals solves several problems at once. You promote your product. You strengthen your company’s positioning. You build recognition of your own name inside a segment where a single decision can outweigh years of generic marketing.

This recognition is intangible capital with very tangible consequences.

But you must accept one uncomfortable truth: without long-term commitments and without systematic interaction with this audience, you will not get the result you claim to want. This is a complex, long-cycle process. Yet with competent implementation, a realistic planning horizon, and rational budget allocation, failing becomes statistically difficult. If you stay the course, there comes a moment when you find yourselves not “trying another campaign,” but quietly dominating your category.

That is not luck. That is strategy.

And if any of you sincerely believe you can obtain a comparable, verifiable level of access to billionaires and centimillionaires—with clear metrics, traceable inquiries, and documented outcomes—for less than €270,000 over three years, I will ask you not for opinions, but for proof. We have ours. We can demonstrate it across multiple industries. If you cannot—then you are not competing on data; you are just talking.

We offer you a 36-month exclusive contract that, when implemented properly, makes meaningful results structurally inevitable—on one condition: that you assess your own offer soberly and understand how the real world actually works.

Explore 36-Month Exclusive Agreement