Richard Perry | $1B+
Get in touch with Richard Perry | Richard Perry, founder of Perry Capital, was one of Wall Street’s most recognized hedge fund managers, known for event-driven investing and complex special situations across credit and equities. After early success at Goldman Sachs, Perry launched Perry Capital in 1988 and built it into a multibillion-dollar firm with a reputation for aggressive risk-taking and sophisticated arbitrage strategies. At its peak, the fund was a major player in merger arbitrage, distressed debt, and structured credit, navigating both market booms and severe downturns. Though the firm ultimately closed after years of volatility and underperformance, Perry remains a defining figure of the hedge fund era.
Richard C. Perry is an American hedge fund manager who founded Perry Capital LLC in 1988 after working in merger arbitrage at Goldman Sachs, building the firm into a multistrategy powerhouse that peaked at $15 billion in assets under management and generated an annualized return of 10.7% over its history.[1][2] A Wharton School graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, Perry specialized in event-driven and distressed investments, achieving notable profits such as $2 billion during the 2008 subprime crisis and gains from Argentine bonds.[3][1]
Perry Capital's closure in 2016 followed heavy losses exceeding 60% of assets in its final years, driven by missteps including a 75% stake in Barneys New York—which filed for bankruptcy in 2019 after Perry assumed control in 2012 and underestimated e-commerce disruptions—and bets on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that prompted a lawsuit against the U.S. government over investor treatment.[1][2] The firm also faced a 2004 $1 billion lawsuit from Carl Icahn alleging share price manipulation during a takeover bid, which was ultimately dropped.[2] In philanthropy, Perry has supported interdisciplinary initiatives at Penn, endowing the first four Penn Integrates Knowledge University Professorships and creating Perry World House for global policy research.[3]
In March 2025, at age 70, Perry launched a comeback by partnering with Olympus Peak Management to oversee a new $500 million distressed credit fund, leveraging prior successes in bankruptcies like Latam Airlines and FTX to signal renewed focus on opportunistic credit plays amid market volatility.[1]
Early Life and Education
Family Background and Childhood
Richard Perry is the son of Arnold Perry, an executive in the office-machinery industry, and Merel (née Cayne) Perry.[4][5] He has two siblings, brother David M. Perry and sister Jennifer Perry.[6]
Perry's family background included business-oriented influences, with his father leveraging professional networks to secure Perry a summer internship at Goldman Sachs during his early career development, reflecting an environment conducive to finance exposure.[4] His maternal uncle, James Cayne, later rose to prominence as CEO of Bear Stearns, underscoring familial proximity to high-level financial circles, though specific childhood impacts remain undocumented in available records.[6] No verifiable details exist on Perry's precise birthplace, relocations, or formative events shaping early discipline or risk awareness beyond these connections.
Academic and Early Professional Influences
Richard C. Perry earned a Bachelor of Science degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1977.[7][8] The Wharton curriculum, focused on quantitative finance, economics, and business analytics, equipped him with core analytical skills applicable to investment decision-making.[3]
Following his undergraduate studies, Perry pursued a Master of Business Administration at New York University's Stern School of Business, completing the degree in 1980.[7][8] This advanced education reinforced his expertise in financial markets and risk assessment, bridging academic training to early finance roles. No public records detail specific internships, extracurricular activities, or mentors from this period prior to his professional entry.[4]
Professional Career
Early Roles in Finance
Perry commenced his professional career at Goldman Sachs shortly after earning a Bachelor of Science from the Wharton School in 1977, initially serving on the firm's equity options trading desk. Concurrently, he pursued a Master of Business Administration at New York University Stern School of Business, completing the degree in 1980 while working full-time. His performance during this period caught the attention of senior partner Robert Rubin, leading to a transition into the equity arbitrage department following his MBA graduation.[7][9]
Within the arbitrage group, led by Rubin, Perry developed proficiency in risk and merger arbitrage strategies, which emphasized event-driven investments exploiting temporary pricing inefficiencies arising from corporate transactions such as mergers and acquisitions. These roles involved rigorous analysis of deal probabilities, regulatory hurdles, and market spreads, fostering a disciplined approach to capitalizing on predictable yet uncertain outcomes in special situations. Perry's contributions extended to personnel decisions, including recruiting individuals like Daniel Och who later founded prominent hedge funds.[10][11]
Perry remained at Goldman Sachs for roughly a decade, until 1988, gaining foundational experience in structured equity strategies amid the evolving financial markets of the 1980s. His departure was motivated by the recognition of greater entrepreneurial potential in launching an independent investment vehicle, aligning with burgeoning opportunities for specialized arbitrage-focused funds outside large institutions, rather than any reported internal dissatisfaction.[4][9]
Founding and Expansion of Perry Capital
Richard C. Perry founded Perry Capital LLC in 1988 after several years at Goldman Sachs & Co., where he worked in equity arbitrage and trading.[12] The firm initially concentrated on event-driven strategies and distressed debt opportunities, reflecting Perry's expertise in merger arbitrage and risk-oriented investments developed during his time at Goldman.[13] As a multi-strategy hedge fund, Perry Capital began operations in New York, targeting opportunities in equity, credit, and structured markets with a value-oriented approach.[12]
The firm experienced steady expansion through the 1990s and early 2000s, growing its assets under management (AUM) amid favorable market conditions for event-driven investing. By 2005, Perry Capital managed approximately $11 billion in assets and maintained its primary office in New York, with Perry serving as CEO.[8] AUM reached a peak of $15 billion by 2007, supported by institutional inflows and the firm's reputation for opportunistic positioning in complex transactions.[14] This period included structural enhancements, such as building out teams to handle increased scale in credit and equity arbitrage desks, though specific key hires beyond Perry's leadership role are not publicly detailed in primary records.
Following the 2008 financial crisis, Perry Capital adapted its operations to shifting market dynamics by reallocating resources toward debt investing. In late 2008, the firm reduced its equities staff by 20 to 30 positions while making targeted hires to strengthen its debt capabilities, aligning with a broader emphasis on credit markets amid post-crisis volatility.[15] These adjustments allowed the firm to maintain flexibility in distressed and event-driven arenas without significant office expansions beyond its New York base.[8]
Investment Philosophy and Historical Performance
Perry Capital's investment philosophy emphasized event-driven strategies, focusing on corporate events such as restructurings, mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations, and spinoffs to capitalize on pricing inefficiencies.[12][16] The approach rooted in deep-value analysis across equities, corporate credit, and structured credit markets, identifying undervalued opportunities influenced by fundamental business dynamics rather than broad market trends.[17][18] Risk management involved selective concentration in high-conviction positions, often hedged to mitigate downside, prioritizing capital preservation amid opportunistic multi-strategy deployments.[18]
The firm's historical performance reflected the philosophy's causal strengths in navigating event catalysts while limiting volatility through disciplined position sizing and hedging. From inception in 1988 through closure in 2016, Perry Capital generated an average annualized return of 10.7%, outperforming relevant benchmarks in most years despite market downturns.[19] In its initial two decades, it achieved approximately 15% average annual returns with no down years, underscoring effective risk controls prior to the 2008 financial crisis.[14] This track record validated the strategy's focus on asymmetric opportunities, though later periods highlighted limits in adapting to compressed event spreads and prolonged low-volatility environments.[20]
Notable Investments and Activism
In 1994, Perry Capital acquired a controlling stake in Florists' Transworld Delivery (FTD), a florist-owned cooperative, for approximately $130 million, privatizing it and converting the entity into a for-profit corporation, which enabled streamlined operations and capital allocation focused on growth rather than member distributions.[21][22] This restructuring facilitated investments in technology and expansion, culminating in the sale of FTD's assets in 2003 for $420 million to a private investment firm, yielding substantial returns for Perry Capital through enhanced efficiency and market responsiveness.[23][24]
Post-2008 financial crisis, Perry Capital pursued distressed opportunities in government-sponsored enterprises, accumulating significant holdings in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred and common shares starting around 2010, capitalizing on undervalued assets amid conservatorship uncertainties.[1] These positions appreciated markedly between 2010 and 2013, with preferred shares recovering from near-zero values to multiples reflecting improved housing market stabilization and legal challenges to government retention of profits, generating verifiable gains for the fund prior to the 2012 dividend sweep agreement.[25] In July 2013, Perry Capital initiated activism through a lawsuit against the U.S. Treasury Department, seeking to end conservatorship and restore private shareholder rights, arguing that full privatization would optimize capital deployment and operational incentives akin to pre-crisis efficiencies.[25][26]
Perry Capital also demonstrated activist tactics in cross-border situations, such as building a 16% economic interest in New Zealand-based Rubicon Ltd. via equity swaps before unwinding them to secure voting rights for a key shareholders' meeting, enabling influence over strategic decisions without initial disclosure requirements.[27] This approach underscored a focus on unlocking value through targeted governance interventions, aligning management with shareholder interests in undervalued assets.
Decline, Closure, and Aftermath
Perry Capital began experiencing significant losses in 2015, with its main fund declining 12.6 percent for the year, followed by a further drop of 2.6 percent in the first seven months of 2016.[28][29] These drawdowns contributed to a sharp contraction in assets under management, which fell from approximately $10 billion in September 2015 to $4 billion by September 2016, a 60 percent plunge driven primarily by investor redemptions amid the firm's underperformance relative to broader market indices.[28][30]
On September 26, 2016, Richard Perry announced the closure of the firm's flagship hedge fund after 28 years of operation, stating intentions to return all remaining investor capital and wind down operations.[30][29] At the time, assets stood at roughly $4 billion, down from $6.6 billion as of December 31, 2015, reflecting sustained outflows triggered by the recent losses.[16][31]
The decision stemmed from a combination of persistent underperformance—marking three consecutive years of losses for the main fund—and challenges adapting to a market environment characterized by low volatility and reduced opportunities for the firm's event-driven investment approach, which had historically capitalized on dislocations.[4][32] Perry cited "unpredictable" markets as a key factor, noting that the prolonged period of subdued volatility following the 2008 financial crisis had diminished the efficacy of strategies reliant on mispricings and activist interventions.[32][14]
In the aftermath, Perry Capital proceeded with the orderly liquidation of its portfolio positions over subsequent months, completing the return of capital to investors without involvement from regulatory authorities.[16][31] The wind-down included layoffs of approximately 32 employees by the end of 2016, signaling the full cessation of the firm's hedge fund activities.[33] Perry transitioned to managing his personal investments independently, stepping away from institutional asset management while retaining no formal advisory roles tied to regulatory oversight.[4][10]
Recent Developments and Comeback
Following the closure of Perry Capital in 2016, Richard Perry engaged in limited public investment activities from 2017 to 2024, focusing on personal portfolio management amid a cautious approach to volatile markets.[34] Specific details on these low-profile endeavors remain sparse, with no major disclosed positions or advisory roles emerging during this period.[1]
In March 2025, Perry, then aged 70, announced his return to active hedge fund management by joining Olympus Peak Management as a partner.[34] This move involves co-launching a new $500 million distressed credit fund, leveraging Olympus Peak's expertise in bankruptcy investments, such as profitable stakes in the Latam Airlines restructuring and the FTX crypto exchange collapse.[35][1] The partnership emphasizes opportunistic strategies tailored to contemporary distressed opportunities, including evolving credit markets influenced by geopolitical tensions and sector disruptions.[34]
Concurrently, in February 2025, Perry transitioned to emeritus status on the University of Pennsylvania's Board of Trustees, following a resolution of appreciation from the board chair for his longstanding contributions.[36] This shift aligns with his renewed professional focus, potentially facilitating intersections between finance and institutional governance in tech-adjacent sectors, though no specific ventures have been detailed as of October 2025.[37]
Controversies and Criticisms
Involvement in Barneys New York Bankruptcy
Perry Capital, led by Richard Perry, acquired majority control of Barneys New York in May 2012 through a debt-for-equity swap that reduced the retailer's debt burden from approximately $590 million to $50 million and included an additional $125 million investment.[19][38] By 2019, with Perry Capital holding a 72% equity stake, Barneys faced declining same-store sales—down about 10% in early periods—and escalating operational costs, including a doubling of rent at its flagship Madison Avenue store to $30 million annually excluding taxes.[39][40] These pressures, compounded by broader retail shifts toward e-commerce and competition from online luxury sellers, prompted the company to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on August 6, 2019, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, listing liabilities between $100 million and $500 million against assets exceeding $100 million.[41][42] As the controlling owner, Perry Capital supported the filing to initiate a sale process, securing initial debtor-in-possession financing of $75 million from affiliates of Hilco Global and Gordon Brothers Brands, later expanded to $218 million from Brigade Capital Management, to maintain operations while pursuing bids.[41][43]
The bankruptcy proceedings facilitated the closure of 15 of Barneys' 22 stores and culminated in the November 2019 approval of a $271 million sale of intellectual property to Authentic Brands Group, with physical assets liquidated piecemeal through going-out-of-business sales.[44][45] This process resulted in significant job losses, including nearly 800 positions in New York and over 300 in New Jersey, contributing to more than 1,000 total layoffs across the chain, alongside reports of withheld severance and vacation pay for affected workers.[46][47][48] Vendors, particularly smaller luxury suppliers, faced substantial unpaid invoices totaling millions, with post-petition claims recovering as little as 40 cents on the dollar amid the company's insolvency.[49] Perry Capital, as the primary equity holder, received no material recovery, with equity interests effectively subordinated and wiped out in favor of creditors, marking the investment as a financial loss for Perry rather than a source of personal gain.[19][50]
Critiques of Perry's involvement have centered on his firm's post-2016 closure—when Perry Capital wound down amid industry headwinds—leading to limited additional capital infusions and an alleged overemphasis on brick-and-mortar expansion at the expense of digital adaptation, exacerbating vulnerability to e-commerce disruption.[2][41] However, Barneys' challenges predated Perry's ownership, stemming from a 2007 leveraged buyout that saddled the company with heavy debt, prior expansions into secondary markets that diluted brand focus, and an earlier 1996 bankruptcy tied to disputes with investor Isetan Co.[51][52] Under Perry, initial post-acquisition performance showed double-digit revenue growth and 40% EBITDA increases, suggesting short-term stabilization rather than aggressive creditor-driven tactics, as Perry operated primarily as an equity owner rather than a debt enforcer by 2019.[53] The filing enabled an orderly asset maximization amid insurmountable fixed costs and sector-wide store closures exceeding 12,000 annually, underscoring causal factors rooted in macroeconomic retail contraction over owner-specific activism.[54][42]
Regulatory Scrutiny and SEC Actions
In July 2009, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a cease-and-desist order against Perry Corp., the investment adviser affiliated with Richard C. Perry's Perry Capital, for violating Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to timely disclose its acquisition of a beneficial ownership stake exceeding 5% in Mylan Laboratories Inc. during a proposed 2004 merger with King Pharmaceuticals Inc.[55] Perry Corp. had accumulated approximately 9.89% of Mylan's outstanding common stock between late July and early September 2004, shortly after the merger announcement, with the intent to vote against the deal to capitalize on arbitrage spreads while hedging economic risk through derivatives.[56] The SEC determined that this strategy constituted an active intent to influence the merger vote, necessitating a Schedule 13D filing within 10 days of crossing the 5% threshold—rather than the less stringent Schedule 13G for passive investors—yet Perry delayed disclosure until October 4, 2004, to avoid alerting the market and potentially eroding the arbitrage opportunity.[56][57]
Perry Corp. defended its approach by asserting that the positions were acquired for investment purposes in the ordinary course of merger arbitrage business, qualifying for passive reporting under Schedule 13G, and that public merger filings already provided sufficient transparency without revealing specific stakes or voting intentions.[56] The SEC rejected this, finding the firm's purpose extended beyond passive investment due to its plan to oppose the merger, and also cited inadequate initial disclosures in the eventual Schedule 13D filing regarding the full nature of its economic interest, including hedges that decoupled voting rights from economic exposure—a practice known as "empty voting."[55][58] Without admitting or denying the findings, Perry Corp. settled the matter on July 21, 2009, agreeing to a $150,000 civil penalty and enhanced compliance procedures, marking the resolution without further litigation or additional fines.[59][55]
This enforcement action highlighted tensions between hedge fund merger arbitrage strategies and regulatory demands for transparency, as Perry's nondisclosure preserved competitive opacity but raised concerns over potential insider-like advantages in influencing corporate transactions.[57] In industry context, while passive stakes typically trigger Schedule 13G filings with quarterly updates, the SEC's ruling established a precedent that arbitrage positions with voting intent—common in event-driven hedge funds—often require immediate, detailed 13D disclosures, challenging norms where funds rely on delayed reporting to maintain spreads without market disruption.[60] No subsequent SEC actions against Perry Corp. or Richard C. Perry personally have been documented in relation to similar disclosure practices.[61]
Performance-Related Critiques
Perry Capital experienced significant client redemptions in 2016, culminating in the closure of its flagship fund after three consecutive years of losses from 2014 to 2016, during which the fund suffered an 18.4% drawdown through July 2016.[29][62] This contrasted sharply with the firm's earlier record, where Perry Capital achieved no losing years in its first 19 full years of operation and delivered double-digit returns in 16 of 23 full years, alongside an average annual return of approximately 15% over the initial two decades.[12][30] Stakeholders attributed the late-period underperformance in part to an over-reliance on arbitrage strategies that had thrived in the 1990s and 2000s but faced diminished opportunities by the 2010s, as merger arbitrage spreads contracted by over 400 basis points since 2002 amid increased capital inflows and crowded trades.[63]
Media analyses highlighted Perry's cautious approach in volatile markets as contributing to muted returns, such as modest gains in early 2016 while global equities surged with double-digit quarterly advances, potentially reflecting a "style drift" away from aggressive positioning.[12] This underperformance mirrored broader hedge fund challenges during the 2010s "lost decade," where low volatility and prolonged zero-interest-rate policies compressed risk premia and arbitrage edges, prompting critiques that event-driven funds like Perry Capital struggled to adapt without shifting to higher-beta strategies.[64][65] For comparison, George Soros's Quantum Fund, a macro peer, returned outside capital in 2011 following similar adaptation issues in a low-rate environment, underscoring systemic pressures rather than isolated mismanagement.[66]
In his September 2016 investor letter announcing the wind-down, Perry acknowledged that his traditional investment style—emphasizing concentrated, event-driven bets—no longer generated sufficient returns in the prevailing market dynamics, weighing the trade-offs of such positions amid narrowed spreads and policy-induced distortions from near-zero rates.[30] Critics noted that while this self-assessment highlighted causal shifts like reduced arbitrage inefficiencies, it also exposed vulnerabilities in maintaining historical edges without pivoting to more directional or quantitative approaches employed by outperforming peers.[65] Overall, these critiques framed Perry's late-career trajectory as emblematic of structural market evolution, balancing prior successes against the inexorable decline in exploitable mispricings post-financial crisis.[63]
Philanthropy and Civic Engagement
Charitable Initiatives and Foundations
Richard C. Perry, through the Richard C. and Lisa N. Perry Foundation—a 501(c)(3) private foundation established in 1996—has directed grants toward charitable purposes, including support for the United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, which funds community programs encompassing education and social services.[67] The foundation reported distributing $400,100 in grants in 2022, with historical expenses peaking at $1.275 million in 2016, primarily for philanthropic disbursements rather than operational costs.[68] These efforts prioritize targeted giving without specified empirical metrics like program-specific graduation rates, though recipients include organizations addressing educational access for underserved populations.
Perry has committed substantial resources to higher education, notably donating $10 million to the University of Pennsylvania, his alma mater, to create the Perry World House—a interdisciplinary center for global policy research and education launched in 2016—and to endow the Richard Perry University Professorship for advancing studies in international affairs.[69][70] Earlier, in 2005, he established another endowed professorship at Penn Medicine to support medical research and teaching.[3] These contributions, leveraging Perry's finance background, facilitate academic programs that integrate economic analysis with global challenges, though direct outcomes such as alumni impact on policy remain institutionally tracked rather than individually quantified.
In collaboration with his wife, fashion designer Lisa Perry, he has backed health-related initiatives with measurable fundraising results, including co-hosting the 2013 Hamptons Paddle & Party for Pink event, which generated $1.2 million for the Breast Cancer Research Foundation to fund prevention and treatment studies benefiting thousands of patients annually.[71] Lisa Perry's involvement often ties her design expertise to event curation for such causes, emphasizing beneficiary reach through research grants rather than operational philanthropy.
Perry's participation in Invest for Kids, a Chicago-based nonprofit, has aided efforts to raise funds for children's programs via investment idea conferences; one such event in 2025 yielded $1.1 million for seven local charities supporting at-risk youth education and development.[7][72] As a recurring speaker drawing from his Perry Capital experience, his contributions align with finance-themed philanthropy aimed at equipping underprivileged children with skills for economic mobility, with supported programs reporting outcomes like improved school retention.[7]
Board Memberships and Public Service
Richard C. Perry has held trustee positions at several educational and nonprofit institutions, providing governance oversight focused on strategic direction and operational stability. At the University of Pennsylvania, where he earned his bachelor's degree from the Wharton School in 1977, Perry served on the Board of Trustees and the Undergraduate Executive Board of the Wharton School, contributing to institutional leadership in higher education.[8] In February 2025, the Penn Board of Trustees honored his tenure by granting him emeritus status via a resolution of appreciation presented by Chair Ramanan Raghavendran.[36]
Perry also serves on the Board of Trustees of the Allen-Stevenson School, an independent boys' school in New York City and his alma mater (class of 1970), where he participates in fiduciary responsibilities for educational programming and facility management.[73] He has been a trustee of Facing History and Ourselves, a nonprofit dedicated to teaching about historical events to foster ethical reflection and civic responsibility in students, aiding in board-level decisions on program expansion and resource allocation.[7][74] Similarly, as a trustee of the Harlem Children's Zone, Perry has supported governance for the organization's cradle-to-career pipeline of services addressing poverty through education, health, and community programs in Harlem.[7] These roles underscore his involvement in nonprofit stewardship, emphasizing long-term sustainability distinct from direct financial contributions.
Political Involvement
Campaign Contributions and Affiliations
Richard C. Perry, through personal contributions and fundraising, has predominantly supported Democratic candidates and organizations. In 2006, Perry and his wife Lisa donated a combined $202,850 to federal campaigns, aligning with the hedge fund sector's increasing tilt toward Democrats, which accounted for 67% of industry contributions that cycle compared to 33% for Republicans.[75][76]
Perry hosted high-profile fundraisers for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential bid, leveraging his Wall Street networks to mobilize support from finance professionals.[77] These efforts exemplified patterns among hedge fund principals seeking influence over financial regulations, though Perry's activities also reflected advocacy for market-oriented policies, such as his legal challenge against federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2013 to promote privatization.[25]
In the 2024 election cycle, Lisa Perry actively encouraged donations to Kamala Harris's campaign, participating in Hamptons-area events and art world initiatives to bolster Democratic fundraising amid broader Wall Street divisions on economic policy.[78] While direct contribution totals from Perry Capital remain limited in public FEC disclosures, such bundling by industry leaders has drawn scrutiny for amplifying donor sway over regulatory frameworks, including Dodd-Frank reforms, without evident bipartisan giving patterns in available records.[79]
Influence on Policy and Advocacy
Perry Capital, under Richard C. Perry's leadership, pursued legal action against the U.S. Treasury Department in 2013, challenging the Third Amendment to the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which implemented a net worth sweep diverting all profits to the government.[80] The firm argued that this mechanism breached implied contractual rights of junior preferred shareholders, effectively nationalizing returns and undermining incentives for private capital in government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs).[81] This litigation, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as Perry Capital LLC v. Lew, sought injunctive relief to invalidate the amendment rather than monetary damages, positioning Perry as an advocate for restoring shareholder protections and limiting post-crisis government overreach in housing finance.[82]
In September 2014, the district court ruled in Perry Capital's favor on the HERA claims, finding the net worth sweep exceeded statutory authority under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 by impairing junior preferred stock without justification, though it dismissed other counts.[83] This decision contributed to broader policy debates on GSE reform, highlighting tensions between government stabilization measures and private investor rights in distressed assets seized during the 2008 financial crisis.[84] The ruling prompted market volatility in GSE securities and underscored arguments for recapitalization paths that prioritize market-driven resolutions over indefinite conservatorship, aligning with critiques of prolonged federal interventions that distort capital allocation.[83] Although subsequent appeals by the government led to stays and the case's ultimate non-resolution at higher levels, it amplified calls among investors for legislative reforms to facilitate GSE privatization and reduce taxpayer exposure.[85]
Perry's advocacy extended indirectly through Perry Capital's stakeholder positions in post-2008 distressed investments, emphasizing efficient restructuring over ad-hoc bailouts. The firm's GSE strategy reflected a broader push against policies that penalized private risk-takers in favor of indefinite public backstops, influencing discussions on bankruptcy-like mechanisms for systemically important entities.[81] No public congressional testimony from Perry was identified, but the litigation's outcomes informed analyses of financial transparency requirements, balancing disclosure mandates with incentives for innovation in distressed debt markets.[82]
Personal Life
Family and Relationships
Richard C. Perry married Lisa Rachel Newberger, a fashion designer known professionally as Lisa Perry, on November 9, 1985, in Manhattan.[5] The couple has pursued shared personal interests, including the acquisition of a prominent collection focused on Pop art and related postwar works.[86]
Perry and his wife are parents to daughter Samantha Jean Perry, born prior to her marriage on August 8, 2010, to James Andrew Watson David in New York.[87] Public details on the family's private upbringing remain limited, with no verified reports of additional children or significant inheritances tied to familial dynamics predating Perry's professional endeavors.
Lifestyle and Residences
Richard Perry and his wife, Lisa Perry, reside primarily in a penthouse at 1 Sutton Place South in Manhattan's Sutton Place neighborhood, a 6,600-square-foot, 12-room co-op apartment occupying the entire top floor of a 14-story prewar building with five bedrooms, six full bathrooms, one half bathroom, and a expansive wraparound terrace overlooking the East River.[88][89] The space, renovated in a modernist style with high ceilings and gallery-like walls, serves as a showcase for their contemporary art holdings and was listed for sale in November 2020 at $45 million amid shifting luxury real estate dynamics during the early COVID-19 period, later relisted in October 2025 at $26 million without a completed transaction.[90][91]
The couple maintains additional residences in Palm Beach, Florida; the Hamptons, New York; and Villefranche-sur-Mer on the French Côte d'Azur, reflecting a lifestyle of seasonal relocations among coastal and urban luxury properties.[1][92] In July 2020, they sold a 5,686-square-foot single-family home in Palm Beach for $9.1 million, achieving approximately $1,600 per square foot.[93]
Post the 2016 wind-down of Perry Capital, Perry has preserved an affluent personal life aligned with his net worth, estimated at $1.2 billion as of 2019, centered on art acquisition and display rather than evident downsizing.[2] He and Lisa Perry, whose fashion design work draws from 1960s aesthetics, have curated a distinguished collection of Pop-influenced contemporary art, including works integrated into their home interiors for optimal viewing, as highlighted during the Manhattan penthouse listing.[86][94] This focus underscores a post-career emphasis on cultural pursuits over professional engagements.
Disclaimer: This profile is based on publicly available information. No endorsement or affiliation is implied.
Join UHNWI direct Affiliate Program
Earn Passive Income by Sharing Verified Contact Information of Billionaires, Centi-Millionaires, and Multi-Millionaires on the UHNWI Direct Platform
Maximize your earnings potential by sharing direct and validated contact information of the ultra-wealthy, including billionaires, centi-millionaires, and multi-millionaires. Join the UHNWI Direct platform and tap into a lucrative passive income stream by providing valuable data to those seeking high-net-worth connections. Start earning today with UHNWI Direct.
You may also be interested in reviewing other UHNWIs profiles.
To find the person you want to contact, start typing their name or other relevant tags in the search bar.
Please note: Our database contains over 10,000 direct contacts of UHNWIs, and it is highly likely that the individual you are seeking is already included. However, creating individual profiles for each contact is a meticulous and time-intensive process, So, if you are unable to find the profile of the individual you are looking for, please click here.
Filter by Net Worth: All | Billionaires | Centi-Millionaires | Multi-Millionaires
Filter by Location: All | USA | Canada | Europe | UK | Russia & CIS | Asia | MEIA | Australia | Latin America
Filter by Age: 1920-1930 | 1930-1940 | 1940-1950 | 1950-1960 | 1960-1970 | 1970-1980 | 1980-1990 | 1990-2000
Related People
UHNWI direct
